Insight · Value Creation

Earnings improvement: a procurement-led guide

Every earnings number is really two numbers: what you sell for and what it costs you to deliver. Revenue moves slowly. Cost, if you look in the right places, moves quickly - and drops straight to the bottom line. This is where UK mid-market operators consistently find earnings uplift.

By Matt Buckley

How to improve earnings: cost is the fastest lever

A £1 of saved cost is worth roughly the same as £4-6 of new revenue at typical mid-market margins. That maths is why cost work is usually the first earnings lever a new CFO or PE sponsor pulls - and why margin improvement consultants tend to start with the cost base rather than pricing. The evidence backs the approach: Digital World Class procurement organisations deliver 96% higher spend cost-reduction savings and operate at 21% lower procurement cost (The Hackett Group) [1, 2], and the same companies show 83% higher net margins and 29% lower cost of operations (The Hackett Group) [1, 2].

Where earnings usually hides

  • Indirect spend that has not been re-tendered in 3+ years
  • Tail suppliers that have quietly multiplied post-acquisition
  • Freight and logistics rates drifting above market
  • Software and SaaS overlap from historical decisions
  • Energy contracts on legacy pricing structures
  • Marketing spend without a clear pipeline attribution

A realistic Earnings improvement plan

A structured plan usually runs in three waves. Wave one is the political window - the first 90 days when a diagnostic and quick wins are expected. Wave two is the harder category work. Wave three is the operating model change that keeps the savings from reappearing.

Wave 1 - diagnose and stabilise (0-3 months)

  • Spend baseline, top-category benchmarks, sized prize
  • Quick-win renegotiations on the clearest overpayments
  • Approval and PO threshold policy reset

Wave 2 - deliver (3-9 months)

  • Category-by-category sourcing on indirect and direct
  • Supplier consolidation where fragmentation is high
  • Contract renewals aligned to actual usage and volume

Wave 3 - hold (9-18 months)

  • Category ownership and governance
  • Savings tracked to the P&L, not the tracker
  • Demand management and specification discipline

What Earnings uplift is realistic?

For UK mid-market businesses that have not run a serious cost programme in 3+ years, a well-executed procurement-led programme typically delivers 8-15% of addressable spend as savings over 12-18 months. On a business with £40m of addressable spend, that is £3-6m of earnings uplift. The same logic applies in deal situations: procurement synergies often represent 25-40% of total merger cost-saving potential, underscoring how much earnings leverage sits in external spend rather than in the revenue line (McKinsey & Company) [3].

Where this connects

This sits alongside our cost reduction consultancy and procurement consultancy services, and pairs with the 100 day cost plan for post-deal situations.

References

Every figure cited above is drawn from the independent sources below. Numbers in square brackets in the text link to the matching source.

  1. Digital World Class(R) Procurement benchmark findingsThe Hackett Group
  2. Digital World Class performance researchThe Hackett Group
  3. Procurement-driven synergies in mergers: landmine or goldmine?McKinsey & Company
  4. Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) statisticsStatista

Need Earnings uplift you can put in the model?

We size the prize by category in two weeks and deliver on a shared-savings basis.